Saturday, November 2, 2019

Journalists are to serve in the interest of the public. Discuss


According to McNair(1998.21) Journalism should serve in the interest of the public in every society they find themselves in. By the principles of journalism, journalists are to serve in the interest of the public but on reality, they do not.
According to Robert Niles(2007), Journalism is a form writing that  tell people about things that really happened but they might not know about already.
The Public Interest is the welfare or wellbeing of the general public and society (Wikipedia).
Journalist to serve in the interest of the public means that a journalist pursuing information that the public has the right to know. This is so because, journalists are to serve in the interest of the public, reporters undisclosed information affecting the public that the Government communication and other powerful interest hold would remain hidden. This means that public interest journalism involves playing of the watchdog role or investigation or investigating reporting. It must include other factual content that serve the public interest either by providing the platform for debates or informing the electorates.
The journalist serve obligation is to serve in the interest of the public means; it means that in practice of journalism, whatever we cover should serve in the interest of the public. These are so because, any contents a journalist will cover broadcast should be a motive of informing, educating, and entertain the public. So if a journalist is not doing these basic principles of journalism practices. It means that you are not serving under the interest of the public.
Moreover, some people have argued that, it is not every information should be made available to the public. The reason is that, should the information you are broadcasting is about national security, if you made it available to the public, the journalist might end up hurting the public at the end or you might end up destroying some norms, values, culture, etc that the society has.
The public interest is not just what the readers, listeners or viewers want either as consumers or people who want to be entertained.
It is about issues which affect everyone, even if many of them are not aware of it or even if they don’t appear to care.
Normally, it is clear to journalists and editors what is and what is not in the public interest, but sometimes it’s a complex question, particularly where privacy is concerned.
It may be useful, therefore, to try to apply a public interest test.
The first task, however, is to separate what is in the public interest from those things members of the public are interested in; they are not necessarily the same.
Many people may be interested, for instance, in celebrity and popular culture, and demonstrably less interested in the dull realities of public services. But the potential for dramatic impact on peoples’ lives makes the provision of basic services – transport, education, health, sanitation, for instance – absolutely vital matters of public concern.
Just because the public is interested in something has nothing to do with whether it is in the public interest.
The public interest is in having a safe, healthy and fully-functioning society. In a democracy, journalism plays a central role in that. It gives people the information they need to take part in the democratic process. That is why there is a public service ethic at the heart all of serious journalism.
If journalists are good at their job, and to win the rust of the public they must hold governments and other institutions to account and they must act and behave ethically.
The Media Helping Media site’s training modules on editorial ethics cover many of the issues involved.
REFERENCES:
Andrea, C.(2017). What is  public interest journalism. university of Malborne
McNair, B. (1988). The Sociology of Journalism. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
Niles, R. What Is Journalism. Pasadena Calif.
Desmondlamptey.blogspot.com

No comments:

Post a Comment